From "White House favorite" to "number one hater", Musk's betrayal revelation

Written by: Oliver, Mars Finance

"I watched him build a tall building, I watched him entertain guests, and I watched his building collapse." The drama of history always seems to be inadvertently dressed in the brocade robe of the new era and performed again. When we cast our eyes on Elon Musk, the seemingly omnipotent "Iron Man" in Silicon Valley, a strong sense of déjà vu arises spontaneously. Once upon a time, he was also a "helper" relied on by certain political forces, and a "White House celebrity" who chatted and laughed with the core of power under the spotlight. His every word and action seemed to stir up waves in the public opinion field and was interpreted as a key signal that influenced the direction of the tide. However, the world is like a new chess game. In a blink of an eye, this influential figure in the technology industry turned his guns around, from a frequent guest in the past to a "number one anti-fan" with full firepower and sharp words.

This dramatic "betrayal" is not just a performance of personal grudges, but more like a prism that reflects the complex interweaving of modern power, business and politics. Musk's transformation provides us with a vivid "revelation": it reveals the fragility and variables of influential people in the political vortex, and also allows us to glimpse the similar fate trajectories of those "iron-fisted figures" who advocated change in history. If history is really a mirror, then from Musk's sharp turn from "red man" to "anti-fan", what irrefutable laws can we read, and what lessons can we learn to warn future generations?

Eye of the Storm: Musk and Trump’s Split — A “Retribution” in Modern Politics?

It is not groundless to compare Elon Musk to the ill-fated reformers in history. The thrilling "war of words" that broke out between him and US President Trump on June 5-6, 2025 was a modern version of the drama of a "hero" turning against each other and becoming a "discarded child". It also allowed us to clearly see the trajectory of this technology giant's slide from "White House favorite" to "number one hater" and the "end" he may face.

Once upon a time, Musk and Trump had a seemingly harmonious "honeymoon period". Musk was once a frequent visitor to the White House and participated in the Trump administration's Economic Advisory Committee. His huge influence in the technology and business communities is undoubtedly a force that any politician would like to win. However, this delicate balance was completely broken with Musk's public criticism of the "massive spending bill" (the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill") pushed by the Trump administration.

This public split filled with mutual accusations, conflicts of interest, "dirty" revelations and even political threats has completely pushed Musk from a possible "election hero" and "White House favorite" to the opposite side of the authorities, making him a veritable "number one hater" and "thorn in the eye". His self-narration of "what he has done" for Trump and his current "end" of being threatened with contract cancellation and accused of "going crazy for personal gain" form a sharp and ironic contrast, which also opens the prelude to our subsequent discussion.

The cost of change: Why do “pioneers” often “die first”?

The modern political drama between Musk and Trump is not an isolated case. Throughout history, those "pioneers" who tried to accelerate the wheel of the times often fell into the abyss of fate quickly after enjoying a brief glory. The reason is that change itself contains huge inherent risks and profound contradictions.

First, reforms are bound to encounter a frenzied backlash from vested interest groups. In any stable social structure, there is a complex network of interests. Whether it is bureaucrats holding power, tyrants who monopolize resources, or those who stick to tradition, they have long been accustomed to the old rules of the game and benefited from them. The emergence of reformers is like a boulder thrown into a calm lake, breaking their comfort and privileges. The new order has not yet been fully established, but the backlash of the old forces has already followed.

Secondly, the inertia and fear of the people are also huge obstacles to change. There is a natural fear of the unknown and dependence on habits in human nature. Even if the old system is full of problems, the people may not be willing to change easily because they are used to this "boiling frog in warm water" state. Drastic reforms are inevitably accompanied by pain and chaos in the early stages. The adjustment of the rhythm of life and the uncertainty of the future are themselves a test. At this time, if the old forces continue to incite and confuse, the doubts and dissatisfaction of the people may converge into a turbulent undercurrent, pushing the reformers to the forefront.

Furthermore, the character and behavior of the reformers themselves often become catalysts that accelerate their tragedies. Reformers who can promote the course of history often have sharp personalities, rock-hard wills, and even an almost paranoid idealism. This kind of personality trait is an invaluable driving force when starting a business and breaking a deadlock; however, once the reform enters the deep waters that require maneuvering and building consensus, this uncompromising rigidity can easily make them enemies on all sides and isolate themselves in the complex political game. Their vigorous and resolute actions may be distorted by opponents as "dictatorial and independent"; their foresight may seem too illusory and become "dreamy dreams" in the eyes of the general public.

Echoes of history: Pioneers who "greater than their masters" or "failed to achieve their goals"

The bronze mirror of history clearly reflects the rough road of reform and the fate of the pioneers. Few of the reform pioneers who tried to turn the tide and rebuild the country were able to retire and enjoy their old age. Most of them died before their ambitions were fulfilled, leaving endless sighs and lamentations for future generations.

Shang Yang: He injected a shot of adrenaline into the Qin State, but set up a place of execution for himself

Shang Yang is undoubtedly the iron-fisted representative of the Legalist school during the Warring States Period. With the firm belief that "ruling the world is not the same, and benefiting the country is not based on the old ways", he went west to the Qin State, hit it off with the ambitious Qin Xiaogong, and led a reform that profoundly changed the course of Chinese history. Abolishing the well-field system, opening up the fields, rewarding farming and warfare, unifying weights and measures, implementing the county system, and enforcing laws and regulations - Shang Yang used his cold and efficient methods to forge the once weak Qin State, which was located in the western corner, into a high-speed war machine, laying an indestructible foundation for Qin's unification of the world in the future.

However, Shang Yang's reforms came at the cost of a drastic impact on the privileges of the old aristocracy and the subversion of the traditional social structure. He replaced family power with military merit, allowing commoners to rise, which undoubtedly touched the fundamental interests of the patriarchal aristocracy. Although the harsh laws he implemented improved the effectiveness of national governance in the short term, they also earned him the reputation of being "mean and unkind" because of their harshness. Even if the prince broke the law, his teacher was punished. Although this demonstrated the majesty of the law, it also laid the groundwork for future tragedies.

When Qin Xiaogong was alive, Shang Yang was still able to be protected. But once he passed away, the crown prince (King Huiwen of Qin) who had suffered from the new law ascended to the throne. The old aristocratic forces counterattacked like a tide, fabricating charges and accusing Shang Yang of treason. Shang Yang tried to flee, but ironically he was cornered by the law he had made, "No one without a certificate is allowed to stay." He was eventually arrested and tortured to death by being torn apart by a chariot, and his family was also implicated. This chief engineer who designed the blueprint for the rise of the Qin State was eventually wounded by the sharp blade of the system he had forged with his own hands. His fate is thought-provoking.

Wang Anshi: The Stubborn Prime Minister's Reform and the Regret of History

Wang Anshi of the Northern Song Dynasty was another reform master who had the ideal of saving the world but suffered a tragic fate. Faced with the plight of the Song Dynasty, which was "poverty and weakness", he implemented the "Xining Reforms" with the support of Emperor Shenzong of Song Dynasty, aiming to enrich the country and strengthen the army, with his extraordinary courage and determination that "natural disasters are not to be feared, ancestors are not to be followed, and people's words are not to be pitied". The Qingmiao Law, the Recruitment Law, the Market Exchange Law, the Baojia Law... a series of reform measures touched all aspects of the country's politics, economy, military, and culture.

Objectively speaking, the original intention and concept of many of Wang Anshi's reform measures were considered to be of considerable progressive significance at the time and even in later generations. He tried to adjust the economic order through state power, curb the annexation of powerful people, increase fiscal revenue, and enhance national defense strength. However, there is often a huge gap between ideals and reality. First, the reform touched the fundamental interests of the conservative scholar-official group represented by Sima Guang. They believed that the new law "disturbs the people", "collects money", and "violates the ancestral system", and attacked it, making the implementation of the new law full of resistance. Second, some good policies deviated during implementation due to improper use of personnel or misinterpretation by local officials, which increased the burden on some people and caused the reform to lose widespread public support. Third, Wang Anshi himself had a straight and even stubborn character, and it was often difficult for him to accept different opinions, which led to his increasing isolation in the court. In the end, with the death of Song Shenzong, the new law was almost completely denied, and Wang Anshi could only die in depression and loneliness with unfulfilled ambitions.

Throughout history, such cases are everywhere. Wu Qi, a famous general in the Warring States Period, implemented reforms in the State of Chu, which made the State of Chu once dominant, but he was shot to death by arrows after the death of King Dao of Chu because he violated the interests of the old nobles. Zhang Juzheng, a famous prime minister in the Ming Dynasty, implemented reforms in the early years of the Wanli period, rectified the administration of officials, measured the land, filled the treasury, and boosted the political situation. However, he held great power during his lifetime, but was liquidated after his death, his property was confiscated, and he was almost exhumed and mutilated.

These reform pioneers were all outstanding figures of the times. They tried to change the world on their own, but often became victims of the counterattack of the old forces, or were suspected and abandoned by the monarchs they had helped. Their tragedy has almost become a fatal curse that reformers in history cannot escape.

Musk's "rebellion" revelation: lessons learned from history and reality

The public breakup between Musk and Trump, filled with accusations, threats and "dirty material", is not just a high-level personal feud, but also deeply reveals the difficulties and risks that reformers may face when dancing with power. Combined with the fate of many pioneers in history, we can draw the following profound inspirations from it:

Revelation 1: The "honeymoon period" of power is always short-lived, and people will disperse when the benefits are gone. The falling out between Musk and Trump vividly illustrates the political motto "There are no eternal friends, only eternal interests." The mutual reliance and frequent interactions in the past become as fragile as flowers in the mirror and the moon in the water when core interests conflict and the balance of power no longer tilts. Musk's self-proclaimed "merits" may have long been a thing of the past in the eyes of those in power, or even become "chips" that can be manipulated at will. When the value of reformers or influential people decreases, or their words and deeds begin to challenge the authority and core interests of those in power, the "honeymoon" of the past will quickly disintegrate, and even evolve into open hostility and liquidation. This is undoubtedly a profound warning to all those who try to use power in the political whirlpool.

Revelation 2: The influence of reformers is a double-edged sword, which can both carry and overturn. The turning points of the fate of Shang Yang and Wang Anshi in history are often closely related to the attitude of the highest authority. Musk, with his huge influence around the world, can be an important bargaining chip in the political game, but it can also become a potential risk factor because it is difficult to control. When he chose to publicly break with a powerful politician and recounted his past "achievements", he undoubtedly pushed himself to the forefront. This is far from a simple business competition or public opinion dispute, but is directly involved in a complex political contest. In this contest, personal business achievements, technological innovations, and even the so-called "fan base" may appear extremely fragile. Musk's "rebellion" posture certainly shows his personality and dissatisfaction, but also puts himself in greater uncertainty. Whether his influence can be transformed into effective political protection, or instead become a catalyst that accelerates his predicament, the script of history seems to be always full of variables. Trump's withdrawal of the nomination of Isaacman, recommended by Musk, as NASA administrator and his hint of canceling government contracts are real manifestations of this "capsizing" risk.

Revelation 3: Character determines destiny, and the courage of reformers is often accompanied by a high price. Musk is now active in the public opinion field as the "number one black fan". What he carries behind him is not only the venting of personal grievances, but also the ultimate embodiment of his unique and uncompromising character. This kind of character is an invincible weapon in promoting technological innovation and breaking industry monopolies. But in the political chess game, excessive exposure and lack of room for maneuver often isolate oneself. Reformers in history, such as Shang Yang's harshness and Wang Anshi's stubbornness, have exacerbated their own tragedies to a certain extent. Musk's "turnaround" this time, from criticizing the "Big Beautiful Bill" to exposing the "Epstein Files" and then supporting impeachment, can be said to be escalating step by step without any concessions. This choice of "hard to the end" is courageous, but the price it may pay has long been given countless references in history.

Conclusion: The Wheel of History and Personal Choice

"The Yangtze River rolls eastward, and the waves wash away all heroes." The development of history has its own internal logic and strong inertia. Any old forces that hinder social progress will eventually be crushed by the wheels of the times. This is an objective law that is not subject to personal will. From this macro perspective, those who dare to challenge the old order and promote social change, regardless of their personal final outcome, have injected momentum into the progress of history to varying degrees through their struggles and attempts. Although Wang Anshi's reforms ended in failure, some of his reform ideas that shine with wisdom have been constantly reflected on and learned from in later generations. Although Shang Yang was torn to pieces, the legal foundation and farming and warfare policy he laid paved the way for the final unification of the Qin State.

However, the grand narrative of history often fails to depict the joys and sorrows of individual destinies in detail. For those reformers standing at the forefront of the storm, the price they pay is often unimaginable to ordinary people. They may need to devote their entire lives to fighting against the inertia and prejudice of the entire era, walking alone in the loneliness of being misunderstood, and even eventually become ideal martyrs, exchanging their own tragedies for a little progress in history.

So, where will Elon Musk, the "disruptor" of the digital age, go with his "betrayal"? Will he repeat the mistakes of many pioneers of change in history? It is too early to draw a conclusion now. In his era, the speed of information dissemination, the frequency of technological iterations, and the breadth and depth of globalization are far beyond the reach of ancient society. The resources, influence, and platform for direct communication with hundreds of millions of people that he possesses are also unimaginable for any reformer in history. Perhaps, with his extraordinary wisdom, perseverance, and deep insight into emerging technologies, he can open up a new path amidst numerous obstacles, thus breaking the so-called "curse" in history that "reformers do not have a good end."

But there is another possibility that he will eventually find it difficult to escape the fate inherent in reformers. When the subversive forces he leads touch certain insurmountable bottom lines, or when he triggers an uncontrollable crisis due to his own decision-making errors, the wheel of history may also ruthlessly abandon him with its usual coldness and determination. Musk's transformation from "White House favorite" to "number one hater" is itself a "revelation" full of warning significance. It warns future generations that in the game of power, there are no eternal friends, only eternal interests; and the road to change is always full of thorns and unknowns.

No matter how the future script is written, Elon Musk's story will become a sample of great research value in our era. It prompts us to re-examine the meaning and cost of change, and to think deeply about the complex and subtle interactive relationship between personal will and historical trends. For all those who are concerned about the future direction of human civilization, this is undoubtedly a drama of the times full of suspense, ups and downs, and profound enlightenment. The alarm bell of history is still echoing, and the thorny road of reformers is still extending ruggedly under our feet.

The article comes from the Internet:From "White House favorite" to "number one hater", Musk's betrayal revelation