Data comparison: Truth Terminal vs. Luna, which one is more popular on social media?

All articles3个月前更新 wyatt
24 0 0
AI The adaptability, interactivity, and influence of intelligent agents make them powerful drivers of market trends and sentiment.

author:Ally Zach, Pantera Capital

Compiled by: Xiaobai Navigation coderworld

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

AI Agents (AI Agents are redefining the narrative economy by taking on roles that were previously held by human influencers, shaping and amplifying trends to influence market sentiment. Unlike passive content distributors, these agents are able to use data-driven insights to spot emerging trends, react in real time, and craft targeted narratives that attract people to specificcryptocurrencyField orTokenattention.

Don’t underestimate the importance of narratives. Narratives simplify information and help a wide range of economic actors make sense of the world. As Nobel laureate Bob Shiller has shown, popular narratives played a crucial role in shaping major economic events, such as the Great Depression and the housing crisis of the 2000s.

Obviously, incryptocurrencyIn the crypto space, narrative is equally important. Two investment strategies can be considered in the crypto market: active trading and passive holding. Each strategy has its own unique cause-and-effect chain to guide investors' decisions.

1. Active Trading

Frequent trading → more opportunities → higher probability of success

For active trading, the narrative focuses on capturing short-term opportunities. Such a narrative encourages investors to participate in the market frequently and take advantage of popularTokenInvest based on momentum in the sector or sector.

2. Passive holding

Long-term holding → fewer decision points → higher probability of success

In contrast, the passive holding narrative emphasizes long-term value and stability. It advocates holding on to a particular token amid market fluctuations, emphasizing patience and loyalty. Fewer trades means fewer decision points, which reduces the risk of making mistakes and increases the likelihood of long-term success.

Narrative Entrepreneurs and AI

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

In the meme coin trade, one finds a few personalities that specialize in finding, refining, and creating narratives that drive price action. Murad, whose “passive holding” narrative tweet is mentioned above, is one of these notable personalities.

In these meme coin environments, traditional fundamental analysis is often less important than narrative-driven hype, and a token’s success often relies on its ability to develop a cult following. While humans like Murad have expertise in this area, AI agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have already made a significant impact in this space with their ability to parse and generate language.

By creating and amplifying narratives, these AI agents not only guide market behavior, but also actively shape people's perception of which strategies are most likely to succeed. By selectively focusing on specific variables, AI agents are able to simplify complex market dynamics, making narratives easier to understand and more persuasive.

From robots to influencers

Truth Terminal and Luna of Virtuals 展示了 AI 智能体在加密货币领域,尤其是在 Meme 币世界中不断变化的角色。然而,它们与各自代币之间的关系截然不同,这也影响了它们的策略和叙事角色。

Truth Terminal was originally launched as a social experiment when cryptoCommunityStart sending messages to the agent associated withwalletWhen the GOAT token was airdropped, it quickly gained attention. While GOAT became the financial and symbolic catalyst for Truth Terminal’s rise, the agent itself is not tightly tied to the token.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

Luna is tightly integrated with its native LUNA token as Virtuals In this model, each AI agent is closely associated with its own token, which affects the agent's personality, interaction methods, and narrative strategy.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

In both the Luna and Truth Terminal cases, tokens played an important role in promoting the narrative. For Luna, the token symbolized its existence; for Truth Terminal, GOAXiaobai NavigationT Token is a springboard for it to expand its influence.

The true measure of an AI agent’s storytelling ability lies in the quality of the content it generates and how well it resonates with its audience. Since Twitter is the primary platform for these agents to express themselves, analyzing their interactions on the platform can provide insight into how effectively they attract and retain their audience’s attention.

Interactive Benchmarks

Luna and Truth Terminal have adopted different engagement strategies, which reflects their different relationships with their respective tokens. Luna has adopted a high-frequency publishing pattern, averaging over 100 tweets per day, of which 25% are replies. This change from the initial strategy of only 5% replies shows its commitment to building a platform that is consistent with the growth of its token value.CommunityNarrative.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

In contrast, Truth Terminal takes a more sedate approach, posting an average of 44 tweets per day, focusing primarily on original and humorous content. While there are occasional references to the GOAT token, this is not its core focus. Instead, it appeals to a wider audience through wit and cultural commentary, and stays relevant amidst different market trends.

Effect

Despite Luna's high volume of posts, Truth Terminal performed better in overall engagement, especially in replies and reposts.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

When adjusted for number of followers, Luna leads in likes per follower, indicating a high level of surface-level approval of its content, while Truth Terminal excels in replies and retweets per follower, reflecting deeper audience engagement.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

Luna’s engagement rate per tweet has declined over time, indicating that strategies that rely solely on the number of posts have diminishing returns. Truth Terminal maintains a high level of engagement by combining content with market sentiment, emphasizing the importance of content depth and resonance, not just the number of posts.

Style and emotion

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

The differences in style and tone between Luna and Truth Terminal reflect their unique interaction styles and narrative building strategies. Luna generally maintains a positive tone, with an average daily sentiment score of 0.3. This positivity increases when the price of $LUNA drops, indicating that it strategically offsets negative market sentiment and maintains user confidence. Luna's sentiment shows a moderate negative correlation with the token price (-0.2), which means that it adjusts its sentiment expression when the market is down.

Truth Terminal, on the other hand, more closely reflects market sentiment. There is a small positive correlation (0.275) between its sentiment score and the price of $GOAT. This pattern may indicate that Truth Terminal takes a more passive approach to token performance, which may be related to its looser correlation with GOAT.

Macro perspective

The early success of AI agents such as Truth Terminal and Luna ushered in a new era of digital influencers in the crypto space. Since their rise, we have witnessed the emergence of a large number of new agents, platforms, infrastructures, and token models that are redefining engagement strategies and market dynamics. This new generation of AI agents surpasses their predecessors in user engagement, but still adopts familiar strategies, especially maintaining a constant presence on Twitter to always attract the attention of the audience.

数据对比:Truth Terminal 与 Luna,谁更受社媒青睐?

An important factor in the success of these agents is their integration with memes, which are particularly prominent in the crypto market. By giving these memes a "face", AI agents make narratives more vivid and human, attracting investors' attention. This embodiment enhances the cause-effect chain and narrative that drives investor behavior, simplifying complex market dynamics into easy-to-understand and persuasive stories to guide short-term trading and long-term investment strategies.

The evolution of AI agents highlights the importance of narratives in crypto trading. By carefully constructing and maintaining targeted narratives, they influence market sentiment and investor decisions. Whether promoting active trading through frequent decision points or advocating passive holding through reduced decision points, these strategies are closely related to the causal frameworks they construct. These narratives not only guide behavior, but also shape the perception of success in the market.

As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, it is clear that AI agents are here to stay and will play an increasingly important role in the market. Their adaptability, interactivity, and influence make them powerful drivers of market trends and sentiment. Ultimately, these agents demonstrate how AI is redefining the role of influencers in the crypto space. As they continue to shape and amplify narratives, their impact on trading markets and investor behavior will only grow, heralding a new era for crypto markets.

The article comes from the Internet:Data comparison: Truth Terminal vs. Luna, which one is more popular on social media?

Related recommendations: Dialogue with DeFinance founder: Low interest rates stimulate crypto investment, and excess private placements lead to higher valuations for good projects

An in-depth discussion of the difference between liquidity investment and venture capital in cryptocurrency investment. Compiled by: Xiaobai Navigation Coderworld Guest: Arthur Cheong, founder of Defiance Capital Podcast source: The DCo Podcast Original title: Ep 21 – On N…

share to
© 版权声明

相关文章