Consensys is sued, and the US SEC takes action again on pledge

Written by: Mary Liu, BitpushNews

The recent regulatory downturn has been very intense. On June 28, local time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Consensys in the Brooklyn Federal Court in New York, less than two weeks after the SEC notified Consensys that it had ended its investigation into Ethereum 2.0.

Not registered as a broker

The SEC accused the company of using its digital assetswallet MetaMask “engaged in the offering and sale of securities” and was an “unregistered broker-dealer” and claimed that Consensys earned more than $2.Xiaobai Navigation$500 million in fees.

The SEC said Consensys “positioned itself as a venue for buying and selling crypto assets (including crypto asset securities), recommended trades with the ‘best’ value (as Consensys itself stated), accepted investor orders, routed investor orders, processed customer assets, executed trade parameters and instructions on behalf of customers, and received compensation based on trades.”

“ConsenSys failed to register as a broker-dealer and failed to register the offer and sale of certain securities, in violation of the federal securities laws,” the court filing states.

Targeting staking

The regulator claims that ConsenSys sold thousands of unregistered securities through staking program providers Lido and Rocket Pool, which in turn issued liquid staking tokens called stETH and rETH.Token, in exchange for pledged assets.

The agency said that investors provided ETH to Lido and Rocket Pool, which was then pooled and staked onBlockchainto obtain returns that investors might not be able to obtain on their own.

The SEC said: “After receiving the ETH from investors, Lido and Rocket Pool will issue a new crypto asset to investors, stETH or rETH, representing the investors’ pro rata interest in the equity pool and its rewards.” The agency added that Lido and Rocket Pool use investors’contractIt is sold and provided in the form of securities.

The SEC also said Consensys itself “acted as brokerage for crypto asset securities transactions” and designated MATIC, MANA, CHZ, SAND, and LUNA as securities, which have been the subject of past enforcement actions.TokenAll have been classified as securities.

“These crypto-asset securities were offered and sold on the Conensys platform from the date of their first offer or sale and continue to be investment contracts and, therefore, securities,” the court document states.

DeFiLlama 数据显示， Lido 和 Rocket Pool 是以太坊上最大的两种流动性质押协议，合计持有 376 亿美元的质押 TVL。消息流出后协议原生Token迅速下跌，LDO 在 30 分钟内暴跌 12%。

This is not the first time the SEC has sued a collateral service provider. In February this year,cryptocurrencyexchange Kraken settled with the SEC for $30 million and shut down its staking services for U.S. customers following the lawsuit. Another industry leader is Coinbase, whichexchangeIt has been fighting the SEC's argument in court that pledges are securities.

Do the allegations hold water?

Factory Labs 首席执行官 Nick Almond 表示，SEC 要求强制开源加密wallet注册为经纪自营商的论点是错误的。

“For me, it’s about custody — the degree of sovereign control that users have over their assets,” he said. “If they don’t have custody of their funds at all, they’re not a broker-dealer.” Traditionally, a broker-dealer is a party that trades securities on behalf of others.

For example, according to the official definition of the US SEC, "a broker-dealer is any person engaged in the business of buying and selling securities for the accounts of others", but MetaMask's Swap service is essentially a "robot" controlled by users who want to execute their own transactions.

This view is consistent with the interpretation of U.S. District Judge Katherine Failla, who dismissed similar charges brought by the SEC against Coinbase Wallet in the case on March 27. The judge said at the time that since it is a self-custodial wallet and users can control their own funds, neither Coinbase nor Coinbase Wallet can be called brokers.

Tuyo founder Jorge Izquierdo said that Consensys and MetaMask are in the same situation. He posted on the X platform that it provides non-custodial smartcontractThere is no difference between support and "providing a UI for any random swap". The only problem is that Consensys charges a fee for providing the swap service.

The same goes for the accusations against the MetaMask staking service, which acts as an “intermediary” between users and decentralized protocols Lido and Rocket Pool that don’t actually exist, with Nick Almond describing the staking service as more of a “UI interface.”

Almond 表示：「将 UI 前端等同于银行或其他类似事物的想法有点蠢，因为任何人都可以直接与智能合约交互，甚至可以在本地运行前端。」

In other words, as long as Ethereum keeps running, MetaMask is just a way to access the protocol, and the protocol will exist indefinitely.

So far this year, the SEC has issued notices, filed lawsuits, or reached settlements with a number of crypto companies focused on Ethereum and DeFi, including ShapeShift, TradeStation, and Uniswap. According to Bloomberg, the agency is also investigating the Ethereum Foundation.

Consensys responded to the new lawsuit by saying: “We firmly believe that the SEC is not authorized to regulate software interfaces such as MetaMask, and we will continue to vigorously seek a ruling on these issues in Texas because they are not only important to our company, but also to the web3 Future success is also important.”

The article comes from the Internet:Consensys is sued, and the US SEC takes action again on pledge

Related recommendation: Interpreting Botanix Spiderchain: Bitcoin equivalent to EVM L2, separation of assets and chains to support smart contracts

Spiderchain aims to combine the ease of use of the EVM with theSafetyCombining the two. Written by: Xiaobai Navigation Coderworld The Bitcoin ecosystem is still a battleground. According to Galaxy Research, one of the most concentrated bets by crypto venture investors in Q1 2024 is to invest in Bitcoin L2 projects. Yesterday, the new BT…