The actual number of users is dismal. Is Farcaster, which has raised 150 million yuan, a trap set by VCs for LPs?

Written by:Liron Shapira

Compiled by: Foresight News, Alex Liu

How did Farcaster, a crypto/Web3 mini-Twitter, raise $150M at a $1B valuation?

Dune Analytics shows that Farcaster has 45,000 daily active users. This number is not outstanding, and it is not even worth mentioning in the social category. What's more, this number is even inflated by spam robots.

Evidence that Farcaster has around 5,000 DAU (Daily Active Users):

I think Farcaster's DAU is between 50 and 5,000, not 45,000 as Dune Analytics data shows.

The Farcaster official client has a public API endpoint to "get all power badge users" which roughly correspond to real non-spam DAUs. API The data returned is - 4,387 users.

Imagine valuing a social network at over $200,000 per user.

What types of content do users primarily post on Farcaster?

Let’s say you’re reading a crypto-themed Discord server, but redesigned the interface to make it look like you’re reading Twitter.

The content I see is partly from real users and partly from using generated AI Garbage robot.

People pointed out that Farcaster had an amazing feature called “Frames” that worked similarly to the canvas feature that Facebook launched in 2007 and retired a few years later.

My response is simply to ask: Is there a compelling use case?

What @dwr (Farcaster developer) had to say on this topic:

Question: What is the coolest app built on Farcaster?

Answer: I love all ecological projects equally.

Is Farcaster in line with the spirit of Web3?

Chris Dixon of a16z said: In Web3, you don’t rent, youhave.

Farcaster:Users must pay Farcaster “rent” to store their data– Currently, it costs about $7 worth of ETH for every 5,000 posts. If users don’t want to pay, their old posts will be deleted when they publish new ones.

Why like Xiaobai NavigationWould venture capital firms (VCs) like a16z consider $1 billion an attractive valuation for a startup with an active user base comparable to that of a niche Discord server?

Are we suddenly entering another crypto bubble where everyone is a paper unicorn again?

I think there are three explanations:

• It’s like Clubhouse

In 2021, a16z valued Clubhouse at $4 billion. That bet didn’t pan out, but its logic made sense.

The valuation of social platforms could grow to over $100 billion. If VCs see an opportunity for an exit like 10%, they could justify a valuation of over $1 billion.

Farcaster only has 0.1% compared to the number of users Clubhouse had in early 2021, when Clubhouse was valued at $4 billion, an extremely risky valuation.

But in my opinion, the real reason is much darker...

• Crypto VCs took LP’s money and don’t want to give it back

If the VCs still have LP capital to deploy and they “put in the $150M” instead of returning it, that means they can collect an additional $20-30M in management fees for themselves.

The cost of 2% per year for 10 years is 20%.

• Web3 is like Weekend at Bernie’s

By now everyone realizes that “Web3” is a logically conflicting idea.

But the VCs who wasted billions of dollars don’t want to admit it and get sued for it.

Farcaster lets them keep this cover. If you squint hard enough you can see a use case for Web3!

The bull case for Farcaster is that it is a protocol, like RSS, that enables interoperable microblogging capabilities on the open web.

In my opinion, this is an idea worth exploring, even though similar ideas like Mastodon haven't posed much of a threat to Twitter.

let us wait and see

I think Farcaster is doing great and the $4 billion valuation is based on team, execution and traction.

The point of this article is that pricing a $1B+ valuation before even finding a path to 500,000 DAUs is so irrational that there is something wrong with the VCs — they are scamming, or just plain incompetent.

The article comes from the Internet:The actual number of users is dismal. Is Farcaster, which has raised 150 million yuan, a trap set by VCs for LPs?

Related recommendation: Degen L3 outage and reorganization, what happened?

Degen Chain stopped producing blocks for more than 24 hours. Written by: Proof of Track Compiled by: Peng Sun, Foresight News At 04:15:29 Beijing time on May 13, the L3 chain Degen Chain crashed and stopped producing blocks for more than 24 hours...